ABSTRACT
Physics lab courses permanently undergo transformations, in recent times especially to adapt to the emergence of new digital technologies and the Covid-19 pandemic in which digital technologies facilitated distance learning. Since these transformations often occur within individual institutions, it is useful to get an overview of these developments by capturing the status quo of digital technologies and the related acquisition of digital competencies in physics lab courses. Thus, we conducted a survey among physics lab instructors (N=79) at German, Finnish, and Croatian universities. The findings reveal that lab instructors already use a variety of digital technologies and that the pandemic particularly boosted the use of smartphones/tablets, simulations, and digital tools for communication/collaboration/organization. The participants generally showed a positive attitude toward using digital technologies in physics lab courses, especially due to their potential for experiments and students' competence acquisition, motivational effects, and contemporaneity. Acquiring digital competencies is rated as less important than established learning objectives, however, collecting and processing data with digital tools was rated as an important competency that students should acquire. The instructors perceived open forms of labwork and particular digital technologies for specific learning objectives (e.g., microcontrollers for experimental skills) as useful for reaching their learning objectives. Our survey contributes to the reflection of what impact the emergence of digital technologies in our society and the Covid-19 pandemic had on physics lab courses and reveals first indications for the future transformation of hands-on university physics education.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
Current clinically applied cancer immunotherapies largely focus on the ability of CD8+ cytolytic T-cells to directly recognise and kill tumour cells1–3. These strategies are limited by the emergence of MHC-I-deficient or IFN-unresponsive tumour cells and the development of an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment4–6. CD4+ effector T-cells can contribute to tumour immune defence independent of CD8+ T-cells. However, the potential and the mechanisms of CD4+ T-cell-mediated anti-tumour immunity are incompletely understood7–12. Here, we show how an indirect CD4+ T-cell-mediated mode of action, that is fundamentally different from CD8+ T-cells, enables the eradication of tumours that would otherwise escape direct T-cell targeting. CD4+ effector T-cells preferentially cluster at tumour invasive margins where they engage in antigen-specific interactions with MHC-II+CD11c+ cells, while CD8+ T-cells briskly infiltrate tumour tissues. CD4+ T-cells and innate immune stimulation reprogram the tumour-associated inflammatory monocyte network towards IFN-activated antigen-presenting and tumouricidal effector phenotypes. This results in an amplification loop driving the release of T-cell-derived IFNγ and myeloid cell-derived nitric oxide which cooperatively induce apoptotic death of MHC-deficient and IFN-unresponsive tumour cells that escape cytolytic CD8+ T-cell therapy. Exploiting the ability of CD4+ T-cells to orchestrate indirect inflammatory killing of tumour cells complements the direct cytolytic activity of T-cells to advance cancer immunotherapies.